It startles me to hear the cautious approach many want to take
in regards to Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein. “We
have no proof he possesses weapons of mass destruction!”
Really? So you would rather propose that we become a nuclear counter
puncher? Nuclear counter punchers don’t fare well in the
“Mother of All Battles-round duce”.
Iraq is a stepping-stone in this battle against
global terrorism, as the singing group Chicago once crowed “it’s
only the beginning”. There are other places we have to visit,
Saudi Arabia, Libya, Iran, Pakistan and last but not least Syria.
We must understand that it’s “them”
against “us”. You got it, Radical Islamic Movements,
that is the enemy. Countries harboring such elements must be made
to pay. It should be a heavy price. A strong message is what they
understand, not appeasing.
Look what appeasing Hitler got Neville Chamberlain.
England was attacked despite Cham-berlain’s butt kissing
of the Fuehrer. Appeasing Saddam is not going to work.
“Wait” you say. “Let him
make the first move”. He already has, he is in violation
of the UN Resolutions passed after the 1991 Gulf War, remember
the one where our soldiers were supposed to be swimming in a pool
of their own blood. He is so colorful that wacky Iraqi.
Time is up Saddam, time is up! Dues must be
paid, and they are heavy dues.
As for the countries trying to roadblock this
rolling thunder review, stand back, this coffee is hot, and we
are ready to rumble!
That's
how I see it!
|