I get emails all the time in responses
to the Webbs World editorials, some are very amusing. Recently
(prior to a week ago and that famous statue coming down) the subject
had been the failed plan of Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld and General Tommy Franks. The emails predicted a Vietnam
era quagmire.
When I read the word quagmire I
already know the tenor of the letter, and the writer. Quagmire
is the terminology of the over-the-hill, 60s era liberals;
one of the vestiges of the Vietnam era, that gold age of the anti
war left. It seems these leftists are pulling for mega casualties
and misfires for our military. These people probably make up most
of Al-Jazeeras English speaking audience...
For those who wrote claiming the war and its
plans were muddled in a quagmire, and we would face losing as
many as 3000 troops capturing Baghdad (2 of Clintons old
Generals, Wesley Clark and Barry McCaffrey, commenting while embedded
in TV studios), check out these startling facts:
- We took Iraq in less time than it took
Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was
a 51-day operation.
- It took less time to find evidence of
chemical weapons in Iraq than it took Hillary Clinton to find
the Rose Law Firm billing records.
- It took Teddy Kennedy longer to call the
police after his Oldsmobile sunk at Chappaquiddick than it
took the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy
the Medina Republican Guard.
- We took Iraq in less time than it took
to count the votes in Florida in the year 2000!
And the Democrats called the Iraq effort a
failed plan? Maybe they would have preferred a repeat of Clintons
Mogadishu, where 18 Army Rangers were killed and dragged through
the streets. Or, maybe they would like us to have sat back and
done nothing about the threats to our country. Well call
that one the 9/11 Approach. Sadly, the Democratic
Leadership is always worried about casualties and innocent civilians
getting caught in the crossfire
until those innocents happen
to be Americans.
That's
how I see it!
|